Confusing the Tool with the Work

  • July 13, 2010
  • Scott
  • 1 Comments

Mike Gammage points out that a recent Gartner report touts BPA for the masses, but fails to understand how absurd that sounds:

Within this context, how can BPA possibly be an activity for the masses? This kind of analysis is understood and undertaken by a small group of IT specialists.

Each kitchen has only a small cadre of pastry chefs. Diners, waiters, the maitre d’ – they may all be involved in continuously improving the mille feuille aux amandes – but it’s the pastry chefs alone who sift the flour and need the rolling pin.

I think Gartner may have, in this instance, gotten tools and work confused.  Some of the tools they are reviewing (BPM Blueprint, and ARISalign) are designed for the masses – but not to turn the masses into BPAs.  The goal is to turn the masses of business users into real participants in continuous process improvement.  Of course, they have features to support BPA activities – but those particular features are primarily intended to support the analysts, not the “masses”.

Related Posts
  • July 20, 2017
  • Scott
  • 0 Comments

Your BPM initiative has produced great ROI over the years, but your executive team is more focused on a hot ne...

  • July 19, 2017
  • Scott
  • 0 Comments

It is a proud moment for me to introduce our readership to Lance Gibbs' new book, "Not My Circus, Not ...

  • July 18, 2017
  • Ariana
  • 0 Comments

In this video Andrew Paier explains when you might want to allows users to complete digital process automation...