Bruce Silver's take on BPMN 2.0

  • March 23, 2009
  • Scott
  • 0 Comments

Bruce Silver has a nice article on BPMInstitute.org about the 5 things to like about BPMN 2.0 (he doesn’t discuss the 5 things not to like – perhaps material for a future post?!).

OMG votes on the proposal in June, but the history on OMG’s voting on BPM-related standards has typically been that it takes longer than I expect for things to get finalized.  I won’t be shocked if final approval drags out a bit longer.

Interestingly, 4 of the 5 things Bruce mentions address weaknesses that at least one pureplay BPM vendor addresses already in their product (implementing more than what BPMN 1.0 spec requires).  Let’s hope there’s more than 5 things to love about BPMN 2.0 – vigorous vendor adoption would be on my wish list!

Related Posts
  • December 12, 2017
  • Scott
  • 0 Comments

Thomas Filaire has a nice primer on Process Mining up on Medium. Including a nice venn diagram showing where p...

  • December 11, 2017
  • Tom
  • 1 Comments

I recently came across a link to a website advertising “The Impossible Jigsaw Puzzle”. The description sta...

  • November 30, 2017
  • Nate
  • 1 Comments

Recently, we posted a blog with a video of a bot enabling "swivel chair" integration (https://www.bp-3.com/swi...