Bruce Silver Reviews Roubroo

  • August 30, 2012
  • Scott

Bruce Silver covers Roubroo on his blog.  It is interesting because it attempts to address ad-hoc changes to a process, without abandoning BPMN.

What happens under the covers is Roubroo creates a new version of the process definition and migrates the current instance, but the end user doesn’t need to see all that.  The backward token injection (while retaining all of the downstream token processing requirements of the BPMN 2.0 spec) is the hard part.

Looks like what they attempt to do under the covers is reasonably complicated (versioning the process definition, etc.) – but they try to simplify that for the user.  I like the design principles involved but I think this is something you have to experience yourself to see if it works for you.

At BP3 we have some “similar but different” ideas for how to tackle this, and we’ll have to return to the topic later after we have a prototype fleshed out.

Related Posts
  • July 20, 2017
  • Scott

Your BPM initiative has produced great ROI over the years, but your executive team is more focused on a hot ne...

  • July 18, 2017
  • Ariana

In this video Andrew Paier explains when you might want to allows users to complete digital process automation...

  • July 13, 2017
  • Scott

Today IBM made its announcement about partnering with Automation Anywhere to create waves in the RPA Space. (Y...

  • Vishal

    Scott, its not complicated if you follow BPMN 2.0 execution semantics. However, if you are in teh business of compiling your process models into Java classes, then its a different story altogether.
    Lets us know if you want to collaborate on your prototype !

    • Oh trust me, we’ve been competing against the “compile” guys since 2003, it is just that I don’t write the product code for IBM BPM 😉