In Case You Missed it: Sandy's Coverage of Progress Revolution
blogging about the sessions she attended. The whole series of posts is worth reading, and I thought a few highlights from her coverage might convince you to read more… On the importance of BPM (and CEP) to Progress, from opening remarks:About a month ago, Sandy Kemsley attended Progress Revolution – first giving an intro-to-BPM course and then
In spite of Progress’ long history with their OpenEdge software development environment, it’s clear that much of their future success is based on the Apama CEP and Savvion BPM acquisitions, and the integration of these product functionalities into a comprehensive solution.On OpenEdge development methods and how they relate to BPM:
Does the integration of BPM just relegate OpenEdge to the scripting/coding language slaved to BPM? Maybe, but that’s not necessarily a bad thing. Instead of layering BPM on top of a monolithic application developed with OpenEdge, it’s about having an integrated development platform that includes BPM as a part of the toolkit. It will be interesting to see how well this message is received by the OpenEdge development community, and how long it takes to actually impact their development methods.And, we can see that Progress took a similar approach to integrating BPM acquisitions as IBM did:
Although (Savvion) BPM Studio and the OpenEdge Architect development environment are both Eclipse-based, it doesn’t appear that they’ve been integrated in any significant manner. Similarly, there are two different servers – although a BPM process can call an OpenEdge functionality, using web services at least – and two different end-user portal environments, where the BPM server functionality can be surfaced in the OpenEdge portal.This approach drew a lot of fire from analysts covering IBM’s integration a year in, but I don’t see the same angst in coverage of Progress-Savvion after 18 months. In fact, I’d say although Progress has the same approach it doesn’t look like they’re quite as far along implementing their strategy. I’m not saying there should be angst – I think both companies are simply taking realistic measures to integrate different product lines. On her realization that this isn’t a BPM vendor conference, during her coverage of Dr. Ketabchi’s talk:
…which really drives home that I’m not at a BPM vendor’s conference, I’m at an application development tool vendor’s conference where they are introducing this hot new technology called BPM. This is, of course, the stage that most of the business world is at with respect to BPM understanding; I’m just so used to being in the BPM echo chamber that I rarely hear these messages unless I’m delivering them to a client.Great material across 7 or 8 posts! Thanks to Sandy for capturing this for those of us who couldn’t be there in person.