Something Besides BPMN for Requirements Solicitation

August 16th, 2010 by Scott Francis

Matt Harding of Aurora Energy just posted this on the SAP community blog:

Within business process modelling (from a detailed requirements and process design perspective), I believe the best option for business users is to use BPMN.  But the question is: Are we just waiting for the iPhone of Business Process Modelling to come along.

I think Matt has a point – BPMN isn’t the best for requirements elicitation – it is the best for firming up an agreement between “Business” and “IT” as to what the process execution looks like.  When we’re in the discovery/elicitation/collaboration efforts, we find it more useful to use simpler mapping approaches:

  1. value stream mapping
  2. outlines
  3. process mapping a la Six Sigma (inputs, measurable outputs, of a linear view of the process)
  4. mind mapping tools for doing associations or nested structures

Right now some of the best tools for doing this – besides white boards – are tools like IBM’s Blueprint, which doesn’t force you into a BPMN notion of things.  It has separate views of process mapping and process modeling – and my main critique of the modeling section is that it needs to be more exact, whereas what I love about the process mapping side is precisely that it doesn’t require being exact.  Another useful tool for brainstorming topics related to BPM: MindMeister.   It let’s you brainstorm ancillary ideas to the process: how business objectives and values drive the objectives for the project.  There are other tools that are useful for brainstorming project plans, etc.

Related posts:

  1. Apparently BPMN is Too Hard
  2. Score one for the BPMN “Zealots”
  3. BPMN = Death to your Process?
  4. Universal Translators, Open Source, and BPMN 2
  5. A BPMN 2.0 Update from Bruce Silver

Tags: , , , , ,