<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Appian 2009 Results</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bp-3.com/blogs/2010/02/appian-2009-results/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bp-3.com/blogs/2010/02/appian-2009-results/</link>
	<description>A Blog about Enterprise BPM and Business Process Improvement by the folks at BP3</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2010 06:28:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott Francis</title>
		<link>http://www.bp-3.com/blogs/2010/02/appian-2009-results/comment-page-1/#comment-1417</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott Francis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 16:59:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bp-3.com/blogs/?p=1671#comment-1417</guid>
		<description>Brian -
thanks.  I would agree that it makes sense that opensource offerings would be doing quite well in this environment (limited budgets and all).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brian -<br />
thanks.  I would agree that it makes sense that opensource offerings would be doing quite well in this environment (limited budgets and all).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott Francis</title>
		<link>http://www.bp-3.com/blogs/2010/02/appian-2009-results/comment-page-1/#comment-4702</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott Francis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 16:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bp-3.com/blogs/?p=1671#comment-4702</guid>
		<description>Brian -
thanks.  I would agree that it makes sense that opensource offerings would be doing quite well in this environment (limited budgets and all).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brian -<br />
thanks.  I would agree that it makes sense that opensource offerings would be doing quite well in this environment (limited budgets and all).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Reale</title>
		<link>http://www.bp-3.com/blogs/2010/02/appian-2009-results/comment-page-1/#comment-1416</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Reale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 11:47:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bp-3.com/blogs/?p=1671#comment-1416</guid>
		<description>Scott,

Nice Analysis.  I certainly agree that BPM pure plays still have &quot;legs.&quot;  We are enjoying an incredible surge in demand right now, and I would argue that Open Source BPM in general is enjoying a considerably faster rate of growth than the proprietary pure plays.  

Your take on the hosted offering was particularly interesting and I would probably agree that you are not far off.  

Regards,

Brian Reale
http://blog.processmaker.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Scott,</p>
<p>Nice Analysis.  I certainly agree that BPM pure plays still have &#8220;legs.&#8221;  We are enjoying an incredible surge in demand right now, and I would argue that Open Source BPM in general is enjoying a considerably faster rate of growth than the proprietary pure plays.  </p>
<p>Your take on the hosted offering was particularly interesting and I would probably agree that you are not far off.  </p>
<p>Regards,</p>
<p>Brian Reale<br />
<a href="http://blog.processmaker.com" rel="nofollow" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/blog.processmaker.com?referer=');">http://blog.processmaker.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Reale</title>
		<link>http://www.bp-3.com/blogs/2010/02/appian-2009-results/comment-page-1/#comment-4701</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Reale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 11:47:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bp-3.com/blogs/?p=1671#comment-4701</guid>
		<description>Scott,

Nice Analysis.  I certainly agree that BPM pure plays still have &quot;legs.&quot;  We are enjoying an incredible surge in demand right now, and I would argue that Open Source BPM in general is enjoying a considerably faster rate of growth than the proprietary pure plays.  

Your take on the hosted offering was particularly interesting and I would probably agree that you are not far off.  

Regards,

Brian Reale
http://blog.processmaker.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Scott,</p>
<p>Nice Analysis.  I certainly agree that BPM pure plays still have &#8220;legs.&#8221;  We are enjoying an incredible surge in demand right now, and I would argue that Open Source BPM in general is enjoying a considerably faster rate of growth than the proprietary pure plays.  </p>
<p>Your take on the hosted offering was particularly interesting and I would probably agree that you are not far off.  </p>
<p>Regards,</p>
<p>Brian Reale<br />
<a href="http://blog.processmaker.com" rel="nofollow" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/blog.processmaker.com?referer=');">http://blog.processmaker.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
