<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Sharepoint Effect Revisited</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bp-3.com/blogs/2009/09/the-sharepoint-effect-revisited/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bp-3.com/blogs/2009/09/the-sharepoint-effect-revisited/</link>
	<description>A Blog about Enterprise BPM and Business Process Improvement by the folks at BP3</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 05:30:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fill in the White Space, and Inverting the Process Life Cycle &#187; Process for the Enterprise</title>
		<link>http://www.bp-3.com/blogs/2009/09/the-sharepoint-effect-revisited/comment-page-1/#comment-6624</link>
		<dc:creator>Fill in the White Space, and Inverting the Process Life Cycle &#187; Process for the Enterprise</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Dec 2011 04:43:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bp-3.com/blogs/?p=1016#comment-6624</guid>
		<description>[...] is summarized nicely as &#8220;the Sharepoint Effect&#8221; in a previous post on this blog.  And I agree with Dave &#8211; many projects start exactly [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] is summarized nicely as &#8220;the Sharepoint Effect&#8221; in a previous post on this blog.  And I agree with Dave &#8211; many projects start exactly [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sfrancis</title>
		<link>http://www.bp-3.com/blogs/2009/09/the-sharepoint-effect-revisited/comment-page-1/#comment-1533</link>
		<dc:creator>sfrancis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 02:34:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bp-3.com/blogs/?p=1016#comment-1533</guid>
		<description>Not everything needs to be &quot;enterprise&quot; by any means.  But there are several really good BPM products targeted at being driven outside of IT - precisely because often IT groups can&#039;t keep up.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;But sharepoint isn&#039;t about automating processes in the sense that most of us think of it.  The process isn&#039;t captured by sharepoint, but if you &quot;follow the process&quot; then sharepoint can be a good repository of information for the process.  Sharepoint processes rely way to much on word-of-mouth to explain what you&#039;re supposed to do in the process.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;And while Sharepoint may be cheaper than &quot;custom&quot; - that doesn&#039;t mean that it is necessarily cheaper than ActionBase or Lombardi or some of the opensource solutions or SaaS solutions out there.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;In the spectrum from pure control to pure chaos, Sharepoint is one notch to the left of pure chaos.  An ERP tool is one notch to the right of pure control.  Most BPM tools are somewhere in the middle - and I think that&#039;s where most organizations should be targeting their process efforts -agile, flexible, but without a total loss of control or governance when needed. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Scott</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not everything needs to be &#8220;enterprise&#8221; by any means.  But there are several really good BPM products targeted at being driven outside of IT &#8211; precisely because often IT groups can&#39;t keep up.  </p>
<p>But sharepoint isn&#39;t about automating processes in the sense that most of us think of it.  The process isn&#39;t captured by sharepoint, but if you &#8220;follow the process&#8221; then sharepoint can be a good repository of information for the process.  Sharepoint processes rely way to much on word-of-mouth to explain what you&#39;re supposed to do in the process.  </p>
<p>And while Sharepoint may be cheaper than &#8220;custom&#8221; &#8211; that doesn&#39;t mean that it is necessarily cheaper than ActionBase or Lombardi or some of the opensource solutions or SaaS solutions out there.  </p>
<p>In the spectrum from pure control to pure chaos, Sharepoint is one notch to the left of pure chaos.  An ERP tool is one notch to the right of pure control.  Most BPM tools are somewhere in the middle &#8211; and I think that&#39;s where most organizations should be targeting their process efforts -agile, flexible, but without a total loss of control or governance when needed. </p>
<p>Scott</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jesse</title>
		<link>http://www.bp-3.com/blogs/2009/09/the-sharepoint-effect-revisited/comment-page-1/#comment-1527</link>
		<dc:creator>Jesse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 01:56:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bp-3.com/blogs/?p=1016#comment-1527</guid>
		<description>For Large Enterprises - &lt;br&gt;Does everything need to be an Enterprise business process?  IM groups can&#039;t keep up to begin with.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Sharepoint business processes can be implemented in little time and quickly solve a specific problem.  For example, a PM has a large project and wants to automate project related processes.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;For Mid/Small Markets-&lt;br&gt;Mid-market and small companies can use the SharePoint framework to develop People Driven processes that span the enterprise.  Way cheaper than developing custom.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For Large Enterprises &#8211; <br />Does everything need to be an Enterprise business process?  IM groups can&#39;t keep up to begin with.</p>
<p>Sharepoint business processes can be implemented in little time and quickly solve a specific problem.  For example, a PM has a large project and wants to automate project related processes.  </p>
<p>For Mid/Small Markets-<br />Mid-market and small companies can use the SharePoint framework to develop People Driven processes that span the enterprise.  Way cheaper than developing custom.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Decision-intensive process management for .Net — JT on EDM</title>
		<link>http://www.bp-3.com/blogs/2009/09/the-sharepoint-effect-revisited/comment-page-1/#comment-333</link>
		<dc:creator>Decision-intensive process management for .Net — JT on EDM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2009 15:31:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bp-3.com/blogs/?p=1016#comment-333</guid>
		<description>[...] many companies business process efforts but, as Scott Francis pointed out in response, there are challenges in using SharePoint. The addition of ShareVis and InRule to SharePoint projects could build on the positives and [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] many companies business process efforts but, as Scott Francis pointed out in response, there are challenges in using SharePoint. The addition of ShareVis and InRule to SharePoint projects could build on the positives and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

