<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Lombardi Blueprint Embraces XPDL</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bp-3.com/blogs/2009/07/lombardi-blueprint-embraces-xpdl/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bp-3.com/blogs/2009/07/lombardi-blueprint-embraces-xpdl/</link>
	<description>A Blog about Enterprise BPM and Business Process Improvement by the folks at BP3</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 05:37:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Process for the Enterprise &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The Rise of &#8220;Social&#8221; BPM Tools</title>
		<link>http://www.bp-3.com/blogs/2009/07/lombardi-blueprint-embraces-xpdl/comment-page-1/#comment-260</link>
		<dc:creator>Process for the Enterprise &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The Rise of &#8220;Social&#8221; BPM Tools</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2009 03:37:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bp-3.com/blogs/?p=892#comment-260</guid>
		<description>[...] to call them BPM Collaboration tools.  Recently we&#8217;ve seen updates to Lombardi&#8217;s Blueprint, the release (into Beta at least) of IBM&#8217;s Blueworks (interesting choice of names, IBM), and [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] to call them BPM Collaboration tools.  Recently we&#8217;ve seen updates to Lombardi&#8217;s Blueprint, the release (into Beta at least) of IBM&#8217;s Blueworks (interesting choice of names, IBM), and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Process for the Enterprise &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Another Model Portability Update</title>
		<link>http://www.bp-3.com/blogs/2009/07/lombardi-blueprint-embraces-xpdl/comment-page-1/#comment-258</link>
		<dc:creator>Process for the Enterprise &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Another Model Portability Update</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2009 06:27:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bp-3.com/blogs/?p=892#comment-258</guid>
		<description>[...] posted another update on model portability.  This is related to the previous discussion regarding XPDL, Lombardi Blueprint support, and model [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] posted another update on model portability.  This is related to the previous discussion regarding XPDL, Lombardi Blueprint support, and model [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott Francis</title>
		<link>http://www.bp-3.com/blogs/2009/07/lombardi-blueprint-embraces-xpdl/comment-page-1/#comment-243</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott Francis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 06:07:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bp-3.com/blogs/?p=892#comment-243</guid>
		<description>Dave- thanks for the clarification - looking forward to seeing BPMN2 support start shipping as well so we have something interesting to compare (between XPDL and BPMN2).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dave- thanks for the clarification &#8211; looking forward to seeing BPMN2 support start shipping as well so we have something interesting to compare (between XPDL and BPMN2).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Marquard</title>
		<link>http://www.bp-3.com/blogs/2009/07/lombardi-blueprint-embraces-xpdl/comment-page-1/#comment-241</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Marquard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 21:25:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bp-3.com/blogs/?p=892#comment-241</guid>
		<description>Scott,

XPDL is definitely a &quot;right now&quot; solution for us in that it clearly has the broadest tool support at the moment. It&#039;s the best solution for BPMN diagram interchange for our customers today. 

That being said, you shouldn&#039;t read support of XPDL as an indictment of BPMN 2.0. We&#039;re firmly behind BPMN 2.0 and think it will be the best solution in the future. In fact, look for Blueprint to be one of the first shipping implementations of the BPMN 2.0 serialization format...

Dave</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Scott,</p>
<p>XPDL is definitely a &#8220;right now&#8221; solution for us in that it clearly has the broadest tool support at the moment. It&#8217;s the best solution for BPMN diagram interchange for our customers today. </p>
<p>That being said, you shouldn&#8217;t read support of XPDL as an indictment of BPMN 2.0. We&#8217;re firmly behind BPMN 2.0 and think it will be the best solution in the future. In fact, look for Blueprint to be one of the first shipping implementations of the BPMN 2.0 serialization format&#8230;</p>
<p>Dave</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
