<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Oracle Buys Sun: Returning to the Old Stack Vendor vs. Pure Play Debate</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bp-3.com/blogs/2009/05/oracle-buys-sun-returning-to-the-old-stack-vendor-vs-pure-play-debate/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bp-3.com/blogs/2009/05/oracle-buys-sun-returning-to-the-old-stack-vendor-vs-pure-play-debate/</link>
	<description>A Blog about Enterprise BPM and Business Process Improvement by the folks at BP3</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 05:30:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Process for the Enterprise &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Stack Vendors vs. Pure Plays Round III, Continued&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.bp-3.com/blogs/2009/05/oracle-buys-sun-returning-to-the-old-stack-vendor-vs-pure-play-debate/comment-page-1/#comment-249</link>
		<dc:creator>Process for the Enterprise &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Stack Vendors vs. Pure Plays Round III, Continued&#8230;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2009 23:27:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bp-3.com/blogs/?p=681#comment-249</guid>
		<description>[...] with the so-called &#8220;Pure Plays&#8221;.  This isn&#8217;t just my opinion, it is backed up by the last 6 years of Gartner and Forrester research in the BPM space &#8211; where essentially they find that 6 years down the road, the big boys are [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] with the so-called &#8220;Pure Plays&#8221;.  This isn&#8217;t just my opinion, it is backed up by the last 6 years of Gartner and Forrester research in the BPM space &#8211; where essentially they find that 6 years down the road, the big boys are [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Process for the Enterprise &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Stack Vendors vs. Pure Plays, Round III</title>
		<link>http://www.bp-3.com/blogs/2009/05/oracle-buys-sun-returning-to-the-old-stack-vendor-vs-pure-play-debate/comment-page-1/#comment-245</link>
		<dc:creator>Process for the Enterprise &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Stack Vendors vs. Pure Plays, Round III</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2009 04:33:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bp-3.com/blogs/?p=681#comment-245</guid>
		<description>[...] there was Stack Vendors vs. Pure Plays, and then there was a followup about Oracle&#8217;s acquisition of SUN.  In the latter post I focused on why stack vendors don&#8217;t have enough focus to really [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] there was Stack Vendors vs. Pure Plays, and then there was a followup about Oracle&#8217;s acquisition of SUN.  In the latter post I focused on why stack vendors don&#8217;t have enough focus to really [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

