<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is XPDL Going to Become a Dominant Process Standard?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bp-3.com/blogs/2009/04/is-xpdl-going-to-become-a-dominant-process-standard/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bp-3.com/blogs/2009/04/is-xpdl-going-to-become-a-dominant-process-standard/</link>
	<description>A Blog about Enterprise BPM and Business Process Improvement by the folks at BP3</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 05:30:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Process for the Enterprise &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Lombardi Blueprint Embraces XPDL</title>
		<link>http://www.bp-3.com/blogs/2009/04/is-xpdl-going-to-become-a-dominant-process-standard/comment-page-1/#comment-240</link>
		<dc:creator>Process for the Enterprise &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Lombardi Blueprint Embraces XPDL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 20:34:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bp-3.com/blogs/?p=618#comment-240</guid>
		<description>[...] been a skeptic of XPDL as the pre-eminent format for BPMN-drawn Models, but I&#8217;ve also been encouraged by Keith Swenson&#8217;s efforts to prove that it could be the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] been a skeptic of XPDL as the pre-eminent format for BPMN-drawn Models, but I&#8217;ve also been encouraged by Keith Swenson&#8217;s efforts to prove that it could be the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

