<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Derek Miers&#8217; Elephant (in the room)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bp-3.com/blogs/2009/04/derek-miers-elephant-in-the-room/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bp-3.com/blogs/2009/04/derek-miers-elephant-in-the-room/</link>
	<description>A Blog about Enterprise BPM and Business Process Improvement by the folks at BP3</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 01:59:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Scott Francis</title>
		<link>http://www.bp-3.com/blogs/2009/04/derek-miers-elephant-in-the-room/comment-page-1/#comment-176</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott Francis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2009 16:27:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bp-3.com/blogs/?p=629#comment-176</guid>
		<description>Derek - 
Regarding the flexibility and variability - you&#039;re right - if the processes can&#039;t be defined with sufficient flexibility then the organization will reject them - and if they don&#039;t reject them, you may wish they had because it may actually create more work (outside that rigid standard process) than before.  

Vendor platforms aren&#039;t equal in supporting this - and I&#039;d argue that practitioners often are even less flexible than the software platforms!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Derek &#8211;<br />
Regarding the flexibility and variability &#8211; you&#8217;re right &#8211; if the processes can&#8217;t be defined with sufficient flexibility then the organization will reject them &#8211; and if they don&#8217;t reject them, you may wish they had because it may actually create more work (outside that rigid standard process) than before.  </p>
<p>Vendor platforms aren&#8217;t equal in supporting this &#8211; and I&#8217;d argue that practitioners often are even less flexible than the software platforms!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: erhum</title>
		<link>http://www.bp-3.com/blogs/2009/04/derek-miers-elephant-in-the-room/comment-page-1/#comment-174</link>
		<dc:creator>erhum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2009 06:07:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bp-3.com/blogs/?p=629#comment-174</guid>
		<description>Not sure why I had to create a log in to your site with Word press when I am already a Word Press user ... but hey. 

I made a follow-up comment on my own posting - the core of which was that while I agree with the central point you make about organizational willingness, there is also a parallel issue of inherent need for flexibility and variability in the processes themselves. If we remove the straightjacket of 100% standardization on the process, the opportunities open up. Of course, some vendor platforms are better than others at this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not sure why I had to create a log in to your site with Word press when I am already a Word Press user &#8230; but hey. </p>
<p>I made a follow-up comment on my own posting &#8211; the core of which was that while I agree with the central point you make about organizational willingness, there is also a parallel issue of inherent need for flexibility and variability in the processes themselves. If we remove the straightjacket of 100% standardization on the process, the opportunities open up. Of course, some vendor platforms are better than others at this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
