<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Keith Swenson on Model-Preservation vs. Model-Transformation</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bp-3.com/blogs/2009/02/keith-swenson-on-model-preservation-vs-model-transformation/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bp-3.com/blogs/2009/02/keith-swenson-on-model-preservation-vs-model-transformation/</link>
	<description>A Blog about Enterprise BPM and Business Process Improvement by the folks at BP3</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 05:30:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Process for the Enterprise &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The Promise of BPM: Easier for Developers, or Easier for the Business?</title>
		<link>http://www.bp-3.com/blogs/2009/02/keith-swenson-on-model-preservation-vs-model-transformation/comment-page-1/#comment-4340</link>
		<dc:creator>Process for the Enterprise &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The Promise of BPM: Easier for Developers, or Easier for the Business?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Aug 2010 13:11:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bp-3.com/blogs/?p=480#comment-4340</guid>
		<description>[...] prefer to use BPM tools with a model-preserving approach (as described by Keith Swenson) because it is a higher fidelity mapping of business process to running [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] prefer to use BPM tools with a model-preserving approach (as described by Keith Swenson) because it is a higher fidelity mapping of business process to running [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott Francis</title>
		<link>http://www.bp-3.com/blogs/2009/02/keith-swenson-on-model-preservation-vs-model-transformation/comment-page-1/#comment-140</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott Francis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2009 04:52:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bp-3.com/blogs/?p=480#comment-140</guid>
		<description>Keith, thanks, very kind of you to say this.  I liked the very logical organization of your posts, taking each concern separately for examination against the two basic strategies.  It was hard to resist reacting to your thoughts and borrowing your organization to do so-  great food for thought, I think.  Good to hear that my posts were received in the same spirit that they were written, and thank you for helping put these issues under a brighter light.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Keith, thanks, very kind of you to say this.  I liked the very logical organization of your posts, taking each concern separately for examination against the two basic strategies.  It was hard to resist reacting to your thoughts and borrowing your organization to do so-  great food for thought, I think.  Good to hear that my posts were received in the same spirit that they were written, and thank you for helping put these issues under a brighter light.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott Francis</title>
		<link>http://www.bp-3.com/blogs/2009/02/keith-swenson-on-model-preservation-vs-model-transformation/comment-page-1/#comment-4574</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott Francis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2009 04:52:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bp-3.com/blogs/?p=480#comment-4574</guid>
		<description>Keith, thanks, very kind of you to say this.  I liked the very logical organization of your posts, taking each concern separately for examination against the two basic strategies.  It was hard to resist reacting to your thoughts and borrowing your organization to do so-  great food for thought, I think.  Good to hear that my posts were received in the same spirit that they were written, and thank you for helping put these issues under a brighter light.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Keith, thanks, very kind of you to say this.  I liked the very logical organization of your posts, taking each concern separately for examination against the two basic strategies.  It was hard to resist reacting to your thoughts and borrowing your organization to do so-  great food for thought, I think.  Good to hear that my posts were received in the same spirit that they were written, and thank you for helping put these issues under a brighter light.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kswenson</title>
		<link>http://www.bp-3.com/blogs/2009/02/keith-swenson-on-model-preservation-vs-model-transformation/comment-page-1/#comment-139</link>
		<dc:creator>kswenson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2009 04:21:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bp-3.com/blogs/?p=480#comment-139</guid>
		<description>Scott, I wanted to thank you for the excellent coverage and interpretation of the ideas from my posts.  I would like to mention that when I was writing these I remember browsing through your older blog posts to confirm my ideas.  Thanks for keeping this excellent blog.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Scott, I wanted to thank you for the excellent coverage and interpretation of the ideas from my posts.  I would like to mention that when I was writing these I remember browsing through your older blog posts to confirm my ideas.  Thanks for keeping this excellent blog.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kswenson</title>
		<link>http://www.bp-3.com/blogs/2009/02/keith-swenson-on-model-preservation-vs-model-transformation/comment-page-1/#comment-4573</link>
		<dc:creator>kswenson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2009 04:21:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bp-3.com/blogs/?p=480#comment-4573</guid>
		<description>Scott, I wanted to thank you for the excellent coverage and interpretation of the ideas from my posts.  I would like to mention that when I was writing these I remember browsing through your older blog posts to confirm my ideas.  Thanks for keeping this excellent blog.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Scott, I wanted to thank you for the excellent coverage and interpretation of the ideas from my posts.  I would like to mention that when I was writing these I remember browsing through your older blog posts to confirm my ideas.  Thanks for keeping this excellent blog.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

